The Pencil Place

Musings on writing, publishing, marketing, creativity, and that other… what's that word?

Inside out? Outside in?

Posted by T J Pontious on March 9, 2010

Character creation.  Some people love it, and some writers struggle with it.  Remember this: the most excellent plot in the world, if it has no characters, is just an outline.  A really good character study is a good read all by itself.

Most writers that I’ve mentored, taught, or reviewed seem to have an outside-in view of how to write a character.  The character description in an email might read something like…

He has a little limp because he was injured in a fishing accident and nearly drowned when he was a kid.  He has a really sharp white streak through is hair on one side – just because he was born that way and folks think he’s either blessed or cursed.  He’s nearly 6′ tall, and weighs about 200 lbs.  He likes to wear boots, and has a dog named Sam.  He is easily upset and some people say he has a nasty temper.

Great.  But what is the man really like?  I usually get blank stares when I ask this.  Look, you can’t judge a book by its cover, so why should I judge a character by a physical description?  It tells me nothing about what he is inclined to do in any given situation, except somehow he might be hotheaded. Maybe.

Peel the skin off the onion.  What kinds of reactions do people display in every culture, every language, every book you’ve ever read?  There are universal constants you need to know about your character.  What are his thoughts on politics? If he hears people discussing political questions is he more likely to roll his eyes and keep walking, or is he going to go on a meandering rant in an effort to try to persuade the people talking?  What are his thoughts on religion?  Is he really claustrophobic, or does he just say that in order to get out of doing stuff he doesn’t want to do? Why is it that he is described as a nobleman, yet he swears like a sailor (and how did that happen?)?  Why?  When?  It’s all in the backstory, whether it needs to be expressed in the story you’re writing or not.

Another approach is to play it by the numbers.  Literally.  Some writers have attempted to write based on dice rolls as if they were playing a roll playing game (Dungeons and Dragons, and any other of the similar RPG nature).  Is he going to turn left and try to find his friend, or is he going to go back to his room and order in a dinner?  *dice roll*  He goes back to get dinner.  Why?  *dice roll*  Uhhh, I dunno.  With a method like this you end up with a random series of misadventures, but decidedly not a plot.  No thanks.

My approach to character development is inside-out.  When I start considering a character, I literally put part of myself directly into the middle of an unfamiliar situation.  You might call it daydreaming.  I call it the act of just letting my id off its leash.  Yeah, my id.  Save your ego for the editing phase.  Look it up (*footnote).

Let’s say I’m having a frustrated day.  I may explore that a little bit and decide that I’m feeling angry, for instance. I let myself ponder what adventures an alter-ego angry guy would do.  Why he’d start off pounding a half-bottle of whisky and then rolling downtown to see the mayor, that’s what he would do.  And then he would try to get into that radio station to talk some sense into that disc jockey that just won’t shut up.  And then he would go back to his hovel and print up lots of fliers on his computer (lots of them!), and then to hand these to everybody who hesitates just a moment too long on the sidewalk.  Hell yeah, in front of City Hall, of course!

Ah, good. Angry guy has an agenda.  What does he look like?  Well, he’s just pounded a fifth, so he isn’t ready for ballroom dancing.  He may walk with a limp because he bruised his leg last weekend when he got tased by a cop.  His left boot also has an orthotic in it because it straightens out his leg a little better – but all it seems to do is to make his foot hurt, which makes him even angrier.  He has a shock of white hair down the left side of his scalp because he used a chemical accidentally instead of a shampoo when he was a child.  He hasn’t been able to trust shampoo since, unless he bought it himself.  He’s been wearing the same blue jeans since Thursday because he can’t remember to buy laundry detergent when he walks by the store.

I really like angry guy.  Now all I have to do find something for him to see in the mirror so I can draw the rest of his face, and figure out the rest of his crash pad.  I think I’ll call him Mitch.  For me, Mitch is a nemonic for ‘itch’, which is clearly what angry guy can’t quite scratch. Maybe he’s going to sober up long enough to run for governor.  That might be entertaining!  What has he done that he regrets?  Probably nothing. What has he done that will not help him get elected?  Oh, plenty….

(*) One of the best books ever for developing male characters is Iron John – A Book About Men, by Robert Bly.  The allegedly educated sophisticates will pooh pooh the book, saying that the Ego and Id are discredited psychological constructs.  Balderhockey!  This book is a goldmine for jumpstarting a writer’s creativity.  Read the book, and release your id.

Yeah, really.

Posted in Character, Creativity, Fiction | Leave a Comment »

Ice it? Yeah, recommended.

Posted by T J Pontious on February 27, 2010

No, this isn’t a weather-related rant.

I gathered up my emergency writing kit and headed for the coffee shop today. I’ve been waiting to hear good news about a job I nearly have but might be miles away from actually landing.  I don’t do ‘patience’ very well sometimes.

My emergency writing kit is a large padded black fake-leather pad folio thingy with a zipper around lots of paper and two pens and two mechanical pencils.  I drink coffee and doodle, either trying to connect dots or create new dots. I doodle maps, I write character sketches. I draw character sketches. I throw down outrageous ideas for plot lines, or characters, or settings.

Sometimes I eavesdrop on other people in the restaurant. Sometimes I just let my Id off his leash to go see what’s in the neighborhood in my mind.  At least I wasn’t in the house, between snow storms, waiting for a phone call.

Among the populated pages was the ominous title, THE DEAD WAR.  I paused. It had a line through it where it had been retitled THE CONSPIRACY OF THE DEAD. There were a few hasty notes from my last session, which evidently had been some time ago.  I remembered the story arc, and I had finished some chapters and posted it online where it had received some pretty good comments by readers.  It seems like only yesterday that I stopped working on it. I guess in some part of my brain I keep going back there and noodling around with the odds and ends of where I left off.

So when I got back to broadband land, I went back to the site where I had posted my material.  It’s a high fantasy adventure tale that boils down to… well it’s a zombie story (without using that word in the narrative).  The last entry is dated 2006, and I was taken back by that.  It cannot have been four years? Okay, maybe it was then.  The site was still up anyway, and that was a relief. There had been some really major changes in the layout, and some welcome upgrades. But four years since I had really tackled a fiction project head on.  Ouch.  Six lonely chapters.

So I re-read what I had scribbled what seemed so long ago.  Yes, some of it was really quite interesting.  Some of it was dreadfully rushed.  Some of it was just a skeleton, lacking any thought but enough to get the reader from point A to point B.  But the characters were compelling, the plot was unexpected, and the comments were really good.

It shouldn’t take four years to go back around to revisit a project and evaluate if it is worth keeping around. The last four years have been fairly tough for me for many reasons, but that shouldn’t be an excuse.

Had I kept with it, I may have sold it.  But I can’t second guess myself on that now.  If I had kept with it, I also would not have the other projects going that I think may be of more long term value for readers.

So I’ll keep it around. Some day, when I get my legs back under myself, I just might move forward with it yet again.  I’ve done worse things with my time.  Those four years gave me enough distance from it to be truly objective about the content and a new perspective on where I had been wrestling pointlessly with plot devices that may or may not be useful.

Posted in Creativity, Fiction | Tagged: , , , | 3 Comments »

The verb I don’t use

Posted by T J Pontious on February 25, 2010

He leaned over his unfinished dinner, and said, “You don’t love me. You never did really love me.”

She took a sip of wine, perhaps to have a moment to think, then she said, “Well, yes I did. I don’t know how it all ended, but I just don’t any longer.”

“I would say” he said, “it was about the time you met Roger on the trip to New York!”

He said. She said. I find the writing life is much breezier without ever using that verb.  If I find myself reading a section that is a verbal pingpong match with the verb “said” as the paddle, I just lose interest. It sits there like last week’s sudoku puzzle, that still somehow is missing some 7s.

And I go father than that. Many writers try to spice up their dialog by using different verbs.  I really wish they wouldn’t. Instead of a pingpong match with predictable rhythms, it becomes a tangled mass of fancier words that often just don’t fit.

  • Replied
  • Retorted
  • Rebuffed
  • Taunted
  • Spat

You get the idea.  Writing is always better when you show instead of tell.  In the admittedly poor sample I started this blog entry with, the characters are (undoubtedly) having a lively discussion, but it reads like a snip from a newscast or some dry experimental recipe.  Instead, please show me what the characters are doing, and how they are reacting. In the right context, I’ll know which character says what without the crutches of he said, or she said.

He leaned over his unfinished dinner, stabbing the dirty end of a fork out over the table. “You don’t love me. You never did really love me.”  John awkwardly stabbed the fork into the apple turnover that he wasn’t really eating anyway. The handle slowly sank to one side.

She took a sip of wine, perhaps to have a moment to think. She slowly nodded her head, letting her curls lightly bob along the sides of her face. “Well, yes I did. I don’t know how it all ended, but I just don’t any longer.”

John leaned back and jutted his chin out for a moment as if thinking.  ”I would say,” he leaned forward and pointed an accusing finger across the table. “It was about the time you met Roger on the trip to New York!”

It’s still some shabby dialog, and here it is without the context of any story. But at least I’ve dressed it up a little.  In my last several fiction projects, I’ve tried to remove all of the little helper verbs in dialog.

Posted in Dialog, Writing | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »

Characters or Plot – which is more important?

Posted by T J Pontious on February 18, 2010

I have to thank @kmweiland for getting me noodling along these lines again. Her tweet was asking just this question, as a question of the day.

My response (in more than 140 characters this time) is that a really well considered character study can still be a really fascinating read.  I love writing back stories for people I see randomly in restaurants or in the stores.

Why is he limping? Why does that kid seem sick?  Geez, how MANY bags of potato chips do you really need?   When you ask yourself those questions, there are two things to do – either ask them out loud (which may garner some funny looks) or write them down and come up with your own fictional rationale for what’s going on a little later.

A really good plot on the other hand, is really just an outline.  It might be a wonderful plot, never before seen by the mind of man, glistening with new promises of movies or maybe a broadway production.  But without characters to develop, the plot is just… a framework.  It’s the skeleton of the story without any of the meat.

So, I think it is sort of like a sandwich. The bread holds the good stuff inside.  That’s the plot.  It’s full of promise, but you really don’t want to taste just the bread.  Sure, there are different flavors of bread and I love them all – but that’s not enough to make me sit up and take notice.  Well, unless it’s fresh out of the oven, but that’s a different story.  The good stuff is inside. The characters.  And it is how those characters react to the plot (which must be somewhere in the mayo and mustard layers) that a really good sandwich is formed.

Yeah. I’m hungry. Sorry about that.  But I like my analogy. =D

Posted in Character, Fiction, Plot | Leave a Comment »

Motivation and Spice

Posted by T J Pontious on November 17, 2009

I found my old recipe card in a book under my chair.  It’s a card that I refer to sometimes when I need to color outside of the lines.

Take some card stock or paper and list the following motivations.  Add any others that come to mind.

  • Vengeance
  • Catastrophe
  • Love / Hate
  • Chase
  • Grief / Loss
  • Rebellion
  • Survival / Deliverance / Escape
  • Discovery / Quest
  • Betrayal
  • Persecution
  • Rivalry
  • Ambition
  • Sacrifice
  • Metamorphosis / Maturation

Now, rip the paper up into strips with one entry on each strip and plop them into a hat.  The next step is to create a set of “Spice” ideas.  Add new spice ingredients as you think of them.

  • Deception
  • Criminal Activity
  • Profit / Loss
  • Un-natural or unwelcome affection
  • Making amends
  • Suspicion
  • Conspiracy
  • Suicide
  • Honor / Dishonor
  • Searching
  • Lost / Found

Again, rip the paper up into strips and put these spices into a different hat.

Now what? Well, of course you guessed it.  Now draw one plot element and one spice element from each hat.  Then spend ten minutes pondering how to mash the elements together into a story, and write down a bare bones plot outline.

Yeah, it might not be what you needed.  But I often find randomness to be a great creativity boost.  Just what would a Chase story have in common with Making amends?  I don’t know, so you’ll have to tell me.

I have a 3×5 card with the above motivations on one side and spices on the reverse.  It keeps me guessing about what the possibilities are out there. And as a writer, it’s all about possibilities, isn’t it?

Let me know if it helps you out!

Posted in Fiction, Plot | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

A Game of Clue

Posted by T J Pontious on November 13, 2009

“Allright. It’s four in the morning, I have a screwdriver, and something is either dead or gonna die!”

Have you ever had one of those nights? I had been up a time or two in the night jiggling handles and checking plumbing parts, but the running water noise was both getting worse and keeping me awake. The float valve had become too tired, and I had to coax it back into working order. It’s okay for now, but it will probably need replacement soon enough.

What I had said to myself kept ringing in my head when I went back to sleep, and somehow the idea of killing a noisy Professor Plumber with a screwdriver in the bathroom took hold. I’ve been in “Clue” mode all day. And another thought came around with it – too many times the protagonist in a story has too easy a time of it in the story.

I think of the Bourne Identity for instance – sure he is awesomely skilled as a spy and assassin. But nothing ever goes really wrong. Maybe I’m just too skeptical, but sometimes I’m pulling for the hero to have a leg cramp just to shut his pious pie hole up for a few pages.

Right now: I’m in the study with a computer, killing time. What have you killed today?

Posted in Creativity, Fiction | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Sometimes you have to go outside

Posted by T J Pontious on November 9, 2009

When I get stuck while writing, I sometimes find it useful to work on something completely different for a bit in order to let the brain reboot itself a little. I’m not sure how it connects in my mind, but my grandfather would sometimes say he had to go outside to have enough room to change his mind.

I was taking a tour around the ‘net, and I stumbled onto this video.  It is a 1927 colour film of London.

It’s absolutely stunning. If I were trying to describe 1927 London, I’m quite sure I would have gotten it so completely wrong as to be laughable. But then the odds are we are all in that boat.  Now at least there is a sense of the city.

And of a little girl selling peanuts.  That just started writing a story for me right there.  And the old boat on the Thames.

Evocative.  I’m really glad I found this video.  I think I’m nearly rebooted now!

Posted in Creativity, Fiction, Setting | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Query letters….

Posted by T J Pontious on November 1, 2009

Just when I’m wrestling with a question, the answer presents itself in the Internet before I really begin searching.

I have books about query letters. I have clippings and other odd bits of bookmarks tagged for research, study, and deliberation.  That doesn’t mean that I know what I’m doing, however.

I love days like this.

What is a query letter in 25 words or less?  Keep it simple – as in this blog post for query letters, for instance.  Thanks, Janet!

Posted in Books, Marketing, Publishing, Weblogs | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Recharging

Posted by T J Pontious on October 27, 2009

That’s my excuse and I’m sticking to it.

Some batteries just need a quick charge and they’re good for a few hours. Some batteries you need to charge overnight and they still drain quickly.

With writers, the batteries need a variable charge at a constant rate, otherwise output suffers and performance is unpredictable.  This is science, I think.

For me, I’ve been reacting to a lot of different stimuli that has kept me distracted from some of my original goals, and that’s partly my fault.  A lot of these things are not really controllable though, are they?  Sick pets, financial stresses, the economy, politics – and all the rest.  I tend to bog down a little too easily at times.  I end up with too many to-do lists.

So now to recharge, I’m reading.  I have a stack of books that I’ve collected over the past two years or so, and an absolutely sick collection of eBooks I’ve downloaded – mostly novels and other works in the public domain.  They don’t do me much good if I don’t read them though, do they?

So I’m reading through the Nag Hamadi manuscripts, the Dungeons and Dragons 4th edition rules, and a biography.  Yeah, well not all at the same time. It’s hard enough to get my bifocals adjusted to a single page, much less that many pages.

And, with a little luck, my world will freeze over soon so that I can breathe easily for a few months – meaning that I will be back in audio book mode.  Otherwise I stop to make too many edits trying to keep the tar off the back of my throat.  I’m looking forward to it.

You know, I never had allergies until I moved to Indiana.  Hmmmmm…..

Posted in Books, Creativity | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

The value of anachronism

Posted by T J Pontious on October 1, 2009

Anachronism: -noun; something or someone that is not in its correct historical or chronological time, esp. a thing or person that belongs to an earlier time (or a later time)

I started thinking about anachronisms this week. I was walking near a military facility, and I overheard a guy behind me complaining, “It doesn’t rain IN the Army, it rains ON the Army, so you better just learn to deal with it!”  From his strident tone (and yes, it was raining) I was expecting some young person, probably in uniform and walking with a colleague.  I slowed down and adjusted my umbrella because I wanted to see if my hunch was correct.

Yes, I do odd things like that sometimes… But I was very incorrect. Both men were in their 50s, a bit rotund, and obviously reminiscing about having to endure rain while in the service years ago. Neither one had a jacket and it was quite chilly.

While this wasn’t exactly an anachronism, it got me thinking about timelines.  If you’re stuck on a story line, maybe it would be more interesting in a different time.  Let’s look at some modern trends and see if we can jazz things up.

Vampires.  Teens eat these stories for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Goth is still quite popular, and the entertainment industry is sucking it for all it’s worth.  But let’s face it, the urban fiction angles have been about played out haven’t they?  Why not think about your vampire story as set on a space station or planetary outpost.  Or better yet, how would Neanderthal tribes have dealt with vampires?  Would they have figured it out or would they just be free food?  Is that what wiped out the Neanderthals?

If your book deals with politics, why stay with today’s headlines?  Why not move everything back 200 years?  Or better yet, find a nice timeline of maybe the Hundred Years War and set it ahead to maybe 2015.

I started a novel once that set a couple of modern guys back to an age that was somewhere between high fantasy and steampunk.  I never finished it because it got too wierd (yeah, even for me).  It was a hidden area where some magic still lingered, but steam power was used as well.  I think about that setting often, and wonder sometimes if I shouldn’t dust it off.

What I’m trying to say is – no matter what you’re writing, if you are stuck just throw it into a different time and see what you end up with.

Posted in Books, Creativity, Fiction, Setting | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »